Tristan wrote:My guess is that the patterns are so "busy" that from a distance it looks like one uniform colour and hence doesn't break up the human outline that much. I find robtattoo's arguement to be quite persuassive re simple bold patterns.
The new or 'current' real tree AP HD is a decorative camo up close, which you can not see at distance, but it is not too busy at all. It works pretty well, bearing in mind camo is not there to make you invisible, just to make you difficult to see. If you look at ASAT's web site you will see highly pixelated and 'fixed' images. (Mossy Oak man in the middle of a field, ASAT man behind a bush).
I found myself being quite sad and have started having 'real life' photography done of me wearing all of the different camo's I have, tested in the same location/pose, and then in different locations. When finished ill see if I can up load some of the photo's.
As an interesting point natural colours seem to work better (hmm... something to do with like looking like the surroundings you are in?!) and nothing is more natural than mud.
check these photo's out on this site
http://www.nativeawareness.co.uk/courses/camouflage/I think it is worth considering that the native americans, who would hunt at CLOSE (less than 5m!) range used natural camo and charcoal ('active carbon'

) to mask their scent.
Well, I just got a King of the mountain 'shirt' for christmas, which uses very natural colours. Going to have to do the whole test again now to make sure they are all in the same conditions. I also intend to use this on my next hunt, as I have a 'hunch' it maybe the best stuff.